I didn't get to see this weekend's game (I was following some friends on Facebook and Twitter to keep up), but I got to see some earlier games (the series against UMass that wasn't league play) and I have to agree. For me, the biggest difference is the feeling of effort. A lot of the things the team did under Whitehead (like the constant dump and chase and the lack of consistent pressure) spoke to a team that wasn't pushing hard, wasn't conditioned and wasn't putting in the required effort all the time. What we've seen so far - whether they are winning or not - is that the effort from the kids is always there.

I'm sure it will still take some time, but I am hopeful that the right values and the right approach are being instilled in these kids. A huge part of the long term success is going to be Red translating the changes and his approach to new recruits who can continue to help improve the program.

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Deron Treadwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I got the chance to see UMaine hockey on TV last night for first time this year.

I will admit that I've been skeptical about the "Red Gendron era" as being an immediate tonic for what ails Maine. I am not going to get too wrapped up in one game, but I saw some very positive things. Most noticeable differences were how Maine no longer just dumps the puck in, they carry it so much more (yes!). The forecheck (at least the lead forechecker) is far more aggressive (and with a purpose). I also love that new line of Byron/Brown/ Morgan. Hutton has also improved a lot since last year. His 3x5 SHG was also an example of the condition he is in because he out sprinted the defenseman after having been killing penalties.

A lot to like based on what I saw. BC game next week will be a real test though.