Mike (et. al.) you might start at <http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash/images/potd.jpg> > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:08:45 -0600 > From: Mike Abegg <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Icing rules question > To: [log in to unmask] > > Now could someone please explain runner advancement under the infield fly > rule??????? > > tee-hee > > Mike A > > Hambone wrote: > > What would be the case if the puck is hit by another skater's stick or > > skate > > after the penalty expires and then crosses the end line? Seems the ruling > > is inconsistent with the end of a game determining when a goal is scored. > > In that case, the time of the shot is not the determining factor but when > > the puck crosses the goal line. In either case, the shooter is firing the > > puck before the expiration of time, whether it be a penalty expiring or a > > game ending. > > > > Hambone > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wayne T Smith <[log in to unmask]> > > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > > Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:32 PM > > Subject: Icing rules question > > > > > >>With the recent fine question and answers on DQs, I'll pitch in with a > >>new question ... > >> > >>In a UMaine game this past weekend, Team A, with their man-down time > >>about to expire, fires the puck for the length of the ice. Before the > >>puck crosses the goal line extended, however, the penalty time expires > >>and Team A returns to full strength. > >> > >>Question: Was icing whistled or waived off? > >> > >>(I must admit, it's been so long since I've seen this situation, I'd > >>forgotten the correct call!) > >> > >> > >>cheers, wayne > >> > > > NOTE: ALL UCCS TELEPHONE PREFIXES HAVE CHANGED FROM 262 TO 255 /"\ ASCII Ribbon | charlie shub (719) 255-3492 \ / Campaign Against | [log in to unmask] (mobile) 761-8778 X HTML in e-mail | http://cs.uccs.edu/~cdash (fax) 255-3369 / \ and news | University of Colorado at Colorado Springs