I believe that some of that may be
discussed in Presque Isle. Is that correct? Don’t believe that Google Earth is
the most accurate source and that E991 and MDOT is.
From:
Sent: Wednesday, September 17,
2008 5:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Planning Project
Update
Good List, however I would like to mention
that from my preliminary review of the E911 centerlines and MEDOT centerlines
in comparison to centerline of 2 most widely used sources (NAVTEQ and
TELEATLAS) for street data in comparison or overlaid to Google Earth. I
have found that there is a lot of mismatch between Google and our local (E911
& MEDOT) sources.
Has anyone else seen this? What
source is considered to be correct or mostly correct?
All your input would be appreciated as I’m
under a task of developing a new state landbase and then there is addressing,
not address ranges. That is another question that can wait, but address
ranges without knowing what that towns standard (50, 100’, or 200’) becomes
very difficult to determine. Then you have towns that have their parcel
data with addressing posted to their websites, but we don’t have access to that
data from the state website.
All input and suggests are welcome.
Thanks,
Greg Davis
Time Warner Cable
P Go Green! Print this
email only when necessary. Thank you for helping Time Warner Cable be
environmentally responsible.
From:
Sent: Wednesday, September 17,
2008 5:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Planning Project Update
In a continuing effort to keep the
Maine GeoSpatial community aware of the actions taking place on the GeoLibrary Board's
strategic planning efforts, the Sewall Team has summarized input received from
the Maine Geospatial community, the 2002 Strategic Plan and the GeoLibrary
Board and provided the following chart entitled, "Overall Maine GeoSpatial
Listing of Issues and Action Items." The chart attempts to summarize
the action items and issues needing resolution. Each issue or action item
has a "potential solution" indicated for it, a time frame for
implementation and a priority.
We would appreciate it if you could
take a look at this summary and provide us with input on them by sending an
e-mail to: [log in to unmask] with the
subject heading noted as "Maine Stakeholder Input."
Once again, we thank you for your
time and effort.
On behalf of Bill Hanson, GeoLibrary board chair…
Will Mitchell
Mitchell
Geographics, Inc.
Office: 207.879.7769
Fax: 207.221.5861
www.mitchellgeo.com
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner
Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential,
or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail
is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any
copy of this E-mail and any printout.