We will need legislation to amend our statute to add additional
members and to change quorum requirements. Getting a sponsor should be fairly
easy, but we should be sure to line up a legislator for any desired action.
I don’t see anything in the GeoLibrary statutes directly
relating to repeated absences or other undesirable conduct (maybe I missed the
relevant text) – I don’t know if there are other provisions - perhaps
of the Administrative Procedures Act - which relate to conduct of agency and
quasi state agency board members. Perhaps there is an assistant AG who could
readily tell us if a law is already in place on this issue. It is a good idea
to adopt some rules to assure maximum participation – particularly since
we are representing constituencies who need a voice.
Maybe the Dept. of Admin and Finance is designated a member
because our governing legislation provides: Staff.
Staff support to the geographic information board is provided by the Department
of Administrative and Financial Services. http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/5/title5sec2003.html
From: Maine GeoLibrary
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Armentrout, Nancy
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: GeoLibrary Board membership
I think a Federal rep is a good one to add as a large user and
potential funder and certainly an unrepresented sector.
As far as other interest groups I can see two schools of thought
there. One, if we start adding interest groups where does it end –
who’s in and who is out? But, on the other hand, interest group
representation could bring new funding sources…and maybe the Board is too
government-centric. What if we added a single Industry representative?
The seat could be filled by forestry folks or surveyors or marine interests, we
could solicit from whatever areas we felt were unrepresented at each time of
filling.
Regarding Legislative representation, I think there is some
validity to that for survival purposes - funding. Having a relationship
and understanding inside of that world would be helpful. Could that be
accomplished by soliciting members for the existing seats who happen to be a
legislator? Should it be a more permanent area in the legislative branch
like a staff member and not a legislator? Maybe one of the government seats
could be taken by someone from this branch.
As far as the Board growing too big and unwieldy, I don’t
know why the Commissioner of the Dept. of Admin and Finance (DAFS) has a seat
(my seat). I was actually appointed by Dick, the CIO, as was Mike, so
does he really have two reps. Should he? Why should DAFS be
specifically represented when other more GIS-involved agencies are not? I
think the answer is the history – the seed money that DAFS put in back in
2002? But is it still relevant?
I think the scheme for non-attending members that we discussed will
work – missing 3 consecutive and 4 over a 12 month period makes
sense. The most we would live with is a year of under-representation but
it could be as little as 4 months if the person never shows up –
right? Do we have a county rep right now? I know we have a seat but
I don’t think its been filled for a long time (at least physically).
I think the quorum and the voting number should be the same and
about half the members. To safeguard against a simple majority win that
might be contentious, could we add some language that says if a vote is close
and only half the members are voting then a revote with at least 2/3 of the
members voting would be necessary?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maine GeoLibrary [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Smith, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: GeoLibrary Board membership
Please
recall our discussion at the previous meeting, I need your comments regarding
changes in the Board membership, i.e.:
What
the membership profile should be - including adding a federal representative
and perhaps others such as we dicussed
Removal
of members not attending regularly
Quorum
#
Voting
#
I
need this by Thursday so I can compile for our next meeting.
**********
Michael Smith
State GIS
Manager
Maine Office of
GIS
NOTICE:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the entity or individual to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager at
[log in to unmask] immediately. This email does not reflect an intention
by the sender or the sender's client or principal to conduct a transaction or
to make any agreement by electronic means. Neither this communication nor any
attachment shall be deemed to satisfy the requirement for a
writing, and nothing contained herein shall constitute a contract or
electronic signature under the Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act, any version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act adopted by
any political subdivision of the