Both goalies were superb ... easily the most interesting part of the game. 

Maybe it was because I was at the far end of the rink from the UMaine Band or because I'm not used to watching through netting, but the pace or fury of many games seemed absent.  Maybe allowing many off-man rushes (again) sapped my enthusiam for the UMaine performance ... or maybe this team needs solid ice to play on ... not the snow and slush that seemed to slow play and make following the puck akin to "follow the bouncing ball".

Holiday cheers, wayne

On 12/18/06, james acheson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
wakefield played better than any goalie maine has seen this year.  it might have helped if maine had screened him more than once though. 


Anthony DelMonaco < [log in to unmask]> wrote:
to have an ok season they'd have to win the rest of their games...wakefield came up big for em last night, 46 shots, 1 got by...i was sitting behind him for 2 periods, maine had many chances but either he was really lucky or just really good...the boys need to get it together in the 2nd half

mosey
 
If you don't have the best of everything, make the best of everything you have

-Shawn Walsh


----- Original Message ----
From: Bob Woodbury < [log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 10:26:40 AM
Subject: Mercy...

Even if Mercyhurst has a "great" season, this will hurt at the end of
the year.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com