>From: Daniel Pearlman <[log in to unmask]> >Reply-To: - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine > <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: The Incoherence of the Pound List >Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:32:42 -0500 > >>Frost .... "tuned-in" ... "astute" ... ??? >> >>I look forward to someone putting forth the proposition >>that Eliot had a profound understanding of women. >An understandable reaction to a provocative statement on my part. >The above remark illustrates the fact that there continues to be an >extremely superficial understanding of the work of Frost. The two >articles I've published on Frost (prelude to a long-researched and >long-planned book on the subject) give a hint of what's still in the >offing. >==DP > > >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > >Dan Pearlman's home page: >http://pages.zdnet.com/danpearl/danpearlman/ > >My new fiction collection, THE BEST-KNOWN MAN IN THE WORLD AND OTHER >MISFITS, may be ordered online at http://www.aardwolfpress.com/ >"Perfectly-crafted gems": Jack Dann, Nebula & World Fantasy Award winner > >Director, Council for the Literature of the Fantastic: >http://www.uri.edu/artsci/english/clf/ > >OFFICE: >Department of English >University of Rhode Island >Kingston, RI 02881 >Tel.: 401 874-4659 >Fax: (253) 681-8518 >email: [log in to unmask] a superficial body of work hardly requires more than a "superficial understanding" _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx