There is some irony in the left shoe singing the tune the right (Wheeler via Pound) once sang. However, the Supreme Court has never appointed a president before - usurping the role of Congress. In this context, the conflicts of interest involving Scalia, Thomas, and O'Connor are especially egregious. Dirk Johnson Assistant Vice President Kelling, Northcross & Nobriga A Division of Zions First National Bank -----Original Message----- From: charles moyer [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 7:45 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: Query re Proudhon Jean-Michel Rabate has this note in "Language-Sexuality and Idealogy in Ezra Pound's Cantos" concerning Proudhon-Pound - "On this point, see Eva Hesse, "Ezra Pound, von Sinn und Wahnsinn", pp.198-222; and, for a more detailed presentation of the Proudhon-Marx controversy, Eva Hesse, "Die Wurzeln der Revolution, Theorien der individuellen und der kollektiven Freiheit (Munich: Hanser, 1974) pp.336-73. Other discussion- Now do I hear the left shoe singing the tune the right one once sang? "'Has packed the Supreme Court so they will declare anything he does constitutional.' Senator Wheeler, 1939." Canto 100 CDM ---------- >From: Carrol Cox <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Query re Proudhon >Date: Sun, Dec 17, 2000, 6:22 PM > > I can't remember if this question has ever been previously > raised or not. Does Pound anywhere in his works or letters > refer to the French anarchist theorist, Proudhon, or cite > his works? Is there any other evidence as to Pound's > knowledge (or non-knowledge) of Proudhon? > > Carrol Cox >