Please root your your comments in references to what Pound actually wrote,
said,  did, or knew or in what he is believed to have written, said, done,
or known....or in necessary background to understand Pound, his word and
action. That would prevent the exchange from turning into a discussion of,
say, the Clinton administration's role in shaping U.S. trade policy
vis-a-vis mainland China, or the daycare situation in Brazil. Not that these
things aren't as important as or even much more important than Pound. But in
EPOUND-L, please keep the focus on Pound.

Tim Romano