I like the state of emergency response, I think that does indicate that
all bets are off, and that we are doing our best to balance services
with public health and safety.
I would add that we are using caution to shorten exposure, CDC considers
"contact" to be greater than 15 minutes. 30 minute visits reduce air
saturation levels (think about how bad bars and restaurants have been)
and the lessens the opportunity for exposure. I read the
guidelines/questions/definitions used by contact tracers to manage our
Then I like to use the word "liability." We do not want to be a vector
My two cents, good luck, I have a patron who challenges me every visit,
but I cite my sources and state things in terms of liability and public
health. He then cracks a joke and leaves, so all is good.
On 2020-08-06 12:01, Andrea DeBiase wrote:
> My understanding is that if we have a State of Emergency Policy, (agreede upon by board and town if necessary?) we can make our own decisions based on what is best for our community...is this correct?
> On 8/6/2020 11:53 AM, Julie Forbus wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I just got a phone call from someone who was irate that we have a limit of 30 minutes for in-house use.
>> Many words about taxpayers, ratepayers, PUCs, etc. were spoken. Is it a LAW? A state law? A federal law? JUST a guideline? Who should she call about this?
>> I was gobsmacked, but kept my cool, citing COVID-19 restrictions. I even told her that many libraries in other parts of the state were still doing curbside with no inside use.
>> So, what IS the answer? I know this person is in the wrong, but I was hard-pressed to find the right words to explain my position, legally. Or is this an ethical decision we are rightly making to keep people alive and hopefully healthy with no legal backing?
>> Thanks for reading,
>> Madison Public