Agreed. That was one thing I liked about how the quarterfinals used
to be played. And in the NHL playoffs, when the Stanley Cup is
hoisted, there is little doubt or room to second guess who is the
better team.
Good points.
----------
From: Alan Harder[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 1997 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: "Best Team"
On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Tuschen, Terry wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Tuschen, Terry wrote:
>
>>>Minnesota teams. You can win 30 or 35 games a year but if you
don't
>>>win the final game of the NCAA Hockey season, you are not the
>>>champions
>>
>>Very true.
>>
>>>nor are you the best team.
>>
>> In your opinion. In my opinion, you cannot throw out the entire
>> regular season when determining the best team. Just forget the
other 30+
>> games? Hardly.
>>
>Alan, your opinion makes a good point. How would you include those
>wins in a formula to determine "the best" team? The best regular
>season teams almost always get a first round bye (which may or may
not
>be an advantage I suppose).
>
Well, first of all, I readily acknowledge that North Dakota is the
NCAA
champion this year. That being said, I notice that the various
computed
ratings still have Michigan as the number one team.
But what would really help would be to drop the sudden death format of
the
playoffs and adopt a best of three series. I'd also like to see a
sixteen team
field, which would rid of the first round byes.
That, to me, would give the championship more weight when talking
about the
"best" team.
-Alan Harder
[log in to unmask]
Go Blue!
The above commentary, which does not *even* represent the opinion of
the American Mathematical Society, is sold by weight, not by volume.
Some settling of the contents may have occurred during shipping.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information
to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
