EPOUND-L Archives

- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine

EPOUND-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Stephen J Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 2 Oct 2013 00:11:21 -0400
text/plain (32 lines)
Bob--

Yes, he was often obscure, sometimes wildly wrong (facts be damned), always brilliant. I understood "medium is message" and transference to media of the New Critical "language not paraphrasable content" thinking that I had been indoctrinated into. McLuhan was a New Critic before he was a media theorist.

SA

On 10/01/13, Bob Dobbs  <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
> The myth is that nobody understood McLuhan in the 60s and by the 90s he was more than obvious, even obsolete.
> 
> How did you fare with his ideas as a student in '67-68?
> 
> Was the "radio analogy" very helpful in grasping Pound?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:39 AM, Stephen J Adams wrote:
> 
> > Bob--
> > 
> > I too was in McLuhan's grad class at Toronto, 1967-68. His talk -- or maybe his oracles -- frequently dealt with relationships among literature, radio, TV and other media. Incidentally, the radio analogy was made earlier in an academic article on "The Waste Land" by Delmore Schwartz in 1945. ("T.S. Eliot as International Hero").
> 
> 
--
Stephen J. Adams
Department of English
University of Western Ontario
"Nothing that is worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime; therefore we must be saved by hope. Nothing which is true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in any immediate context of history; therefore we must be saved by faith. Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we must be saved by love." 
  Reinhold Niebuhr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2