Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Mar 1995 23:56:16 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In article <[log in to unmask]>,
Bradley Carlson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>It seemed to myself and many other people at Saturday's UMich/Wisc game
>that there was a lot of confusion when or when not to play 4 on 4 when they
> called coincidental penalties. The incident that stands out in my mind is
> when a player from each team was given 4 min. for roughing(I think it was
> roughing). The officials called for each team to put an extra man in the
>box while they played 4 on 4 for two minutes. They then played the last 2
> minutes of the penalties at 5 on 5. I know this was discussed recently
>on Hockey-L but I would appreciate it if someone could clear up my
>confussion. Thanks in advance!
>
>Brad Carlson
>U Mich
>1995 NCAA Final Four!!!
Kurt and I discussed this as we watched the play, and we both wondered what
was going on.
Apparently it goes like this:
The first set of coincidental minors forces the 2 minutes. At the end of 2
minutes, the 4x4 must be replaced. The second set of 2 minute minors
are no loss of manpower. So, there must be a 4x4 for the first set
of matching minors, and no replacement for the second set. Therefore,
someone must come out of the box after 2 minutes to make it 5x5.
Hope that explains it.
BTW, I walked to the meeting place on Saturday, but did not find anyone.
Sorry I missed everyone. I just hope I was in the right place.
*****************************************************************************
* Jayson Moy RPI '89 '93 * One of the Voices of Rensselaer Engineer *
* [log in to unmask] * Hockey, Baseball, Football, and Basketball *
* The "Asian Invasion" * on Crystal Clear 91.5FM WRPI, Troy *EASM* *
*****************************************************************************
|
|
|