EPOUND-L Archives

- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine

EPOUND-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Stoneking <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:33:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
After years living among the Pintupi tribe
of Central Australia, I came to realise that
in order to understand modern physics one has only to
mind one's own business... a near-impossible feat
in our post-modern drift...
 
Billy Marshall Stoneking
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Pound Outside the Academy
 
 
> >
> >As a life-long reader of both Pound and the _Post_, I have to comment on
> >this one -- I would challenge anyone to look through the _Post's_ sports
> >section, chess column, bridge column etc. and then continue to make this
> >argument -- Why is the jargon of sports reporting considered "accessible"
> >no matter how opaque it gets, while modernist verse is considered
elitist?
> >On any given day, the paper's sports section (and business section for
that
> >matter) is filled with arcane refs. comprehended only by the intiates --
> >And my freshmen find the bridge columns easily the equal of Pound at his
> >most allusive -- Many on this list are familiar with my criticisms of
> >Pound's politics and racism -- BUT, it's no more difficult to look up
> >Pound's refs. than it is to look up a player's "rubies" for the year
1984.
>
> Nobody has mentioned this yet, so I'll  heave it  in--
> To understand modern physics in general, and quantum mechanics
> in particular,  requires several special "languages" -- all of them
> mathematical -- and, in addition, a general background in operational
> philosophy, pragmatism, non-aristitelian logics and non-cumutative
> [Hamiltonian] thought.
> Far more work than required for either EP or the bridge column......
>
> I wonder if Mr Wagner considers physicists as elitist snobs, too?
>
> mark chan
>
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> That is precisely what common sense is for, to be jarred into uncommon
> sense.  One of the chief services whcih mathematics has  rendered the
> human race in the past century is to put "common sense" where it
> belongs, on the topmost shelf next to the dust cannister labeled
> "discarded nonsense."
>         Eric  Temple   Bell, Mathematics: Queen of the Sciences
>
>
> Las die Lasagne weiter fliegen!
>
> ~
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2