Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 16 Mar 1998 10:19:16 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey ratings percentage index
based on 742 games played through 03/15/98
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscollegehockey.com
Weight 35% 50% 15%
G W L T win% rank opp% rank opp-opp Total
1 North Dakota 36 29- 6- 1 81.94 ( 1) 51.39 (14) 50.85 (15) 62.00
2 Michigan State 38 29- 5- 4 81.58 ( 2) 50.70 (20) 51.01 (11) 61.55
3 Boston University 36 27- 7- 2 77.78 ( 3) 49.21 (29) 51.14 ( 8) 59.50
4 Michigan 39 28-10- 1 73.08 ( 5) 50.94 (17) 51.28 ( 5) 58.74
5 Boston College 36 23- 8- 5 70.83 ( 7) 50.66 (21) 51.33 ( 3) 57.82
6 Clarkson 31 21- 7- 3 72.58 ( 6) 49.24 (28) 48.83 (34) 57.35
7 Ohio State 36 23-11- 2 66.67 ( 9) 50.39 (24) 51.17 ( 7) 56.20
8 New Hampshire 34 22-11- 1 66.18 (10) 50.42 (22) 50.78 (19) 55.99
9 Yale 32 23- 6- 3 76.56 ( 4) 43.05 (42) 48.99 (33) 55.67
10 Colorado College 38 24-11- 3 67.11 ( 8) 47.62 (36) 50.99 (12) 54.95
11 Wisconsin 36 22-13- 1 62.50 (11) 50.21 (25) 51.59 ( 1) 54.72
12 St Cloud 35 19-14- 2 57.14 (12) 52.27 ( 8) 51.08 ( 9) 53.80
13 Northern Michigan 36 18-14- 4 55.56 (14) 51.68 (11) 50.83 (17) 52.91
14 Maine 31 14-13- 4 51.61 (19) 53.51 ( 5) 50.71 (20) 52.43
15 Minnesota-Duluth 37 19-16- 2 54.05 (18) 50.82 (19) 51.31 ( 4) 52.03
16 Northeastern 37 19-15- 3 55.41 (16) 49.96 (26) 50.90 (13) 52.01
17 Miami 36 18-14- 4 55.56 (14) 49.14 (31) 51.50 ( 2) 51.74
18 Notre Dame 40 17-19- 4 47.50 (23) 53.69 ( 4) 50.83 (18) 51.09
19 Mass Lowell 35 16-16- 3 50.00 (20) 51.71 (10) 49.63 (27) 50.80
20 Minnesota 39 17-22- 0 43.59 (30) 55.36 ( 1) 50.55 (23) 50.52
21 Harvard 31 13-16- 2 45.16 (27) 54.10 ( 3) 48.31 (41) 50.10
22 Rensselaer 34 17-13- 4 55.88 (13) 46.42 (38) 48.56 (37) 50.05
23 Lake Superior 36 15-17- 4 47.22 (24) 51.39 (13) 50.54 (24) 49.81
24 Princeton 30 13-10- 7 55.00 (17) 46.00 (39) 48.82 (35) 49.57
25 Providence 36 15-18- 3 45.83 (26) 51.09 (16) 49.78 (26) 49.06
26 Ferris State 38 15-20- 3 43.42 (31) 52.05 ( 9) 50.61 (22) 48.81
27 Cornell 31 14-15- 2 48.39 (22) 49.03 (32) 48.55 (38) 48.73
28 Brown 31 13-16- 2 45.16 (27) 50.93 (18) 48.58 (36) 48.56
29 Colgate 33 14-15- 4 48.48 (21) 47.71 (35) 49.18 (29) 48.20
30 Michigan Tech 37 14-20- 3 41.89 (32) 50.40 (23) 51.05 (10) 47.52
31 Mankato State 30 12-15- 3 45.00 (29) 47.19 (37) 48.47 (40) 46.62
32 Denver 36 11-23- 2 33.33 (34) 53.13 ( 7) 49.95 (25) 45.72
33 Dartmouth 29 11-13- 5 46.55 (25) 43.80 (41) 49.08 (32) 45.55
34 St Lawrence 32 8-20- 4 31.25 (35) 54.77 ( 2) 47.70 (42) 45.48
35 Merrimack 36 10-25- 1 29.17 (38) 53.50 ( 6) 49.09 (31) 44.32
36 Vermont 34 10-20- 4 35.29 (33) 49.16 (30) 49.15 (30) 44.31
37 Western Michigan 37 10-25- 2 29.73 (37) 51.47 (12) 50.85 (16) 43.77
38 Alaska-Fairbanks 32 8-20- 4 31.25 (35) 48.92 (33) 51.18 ( 6) 43.08
39 Bowling Green 37 7-27- 3 22.97 (42) 51.33 (15) 50.67 (21) 41.30
40 Alaska-Anchorage 36 6-25- 5 23.61 (40) 49.74 (27) 50.86 (14) 40.76
41 Mass Amherst 31 5-23- 3 20.97 (43) 47.82 (34) 49.40 (28) 38.66
42 Union 30 5-21- 4 23.33 (41) 45.71 (40) 48.53 (39) 38.30
43 Air Force 12 3- 9- 0 25.00 (39) 37.02 (44) 46.77 (43) 34.28
44 Army 17 2-15- 0 11.76 (44) 42.51 (43) 46.16 (44) 32.29
Average 48.93 49.71 49.94 49.47
Standard Deviation 17.52 3.46 1.32 6.68
range 11.76 37.02 46.16
to 81.94 55.36 51.59
This information is freely available for personal use.
Copyright 1998 Charlie Shub.
Republication without permission is prohibited.
This calculation includes only teams eligible for the NCAA tournament.
Since Nebraska-Omaha and Niagara both fit the definition of
an Emerging Program, and the NCAA does not include emerging programs
in their calculations, their games are not included.
The total is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method,
used as a tool by the NCAA in selecting teams for national
collegiate tournaments in several sports. Ratings are derived
by summing each team's winning percentage, the average winning
percentage of its opponents, and the average winning percentage
of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by the given weights.
Factors such as importance of game, margin of victory, or home
ice are not included in the calculations.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask]
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369 http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|