Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 14 Mar 1994 00:51:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The College Hockey Computer Rating
Includes games on 3/13/94. Last ranking includes games on 3/6/94.
Last Division I
Rank Rank Team Record Performance Schedule Rating
1 1 Boston University 28 7 1 58.33 3 10.80 16 69.14
2 2 Michigan 31 6 1 65.79 1 0.66 27 66.45
3 4 Wisconsin 24 13 1 28.95 11 22.28 8 51.23
4 5 Minnesota 22 12 4 26.32 14 22.46 7 48.77
5 3 Colorado College 23 11 5 30.77 8 14.99 11 45.76
6 6 Lake Superior 26 9 4 43.59 5 0.55 28 44.13
7 7 Northern Michigan 22 15 1 18.42 18 22.72 5 41.14
8 9 St Cloud 20 12 4 22.22 15 17.34 10 39.57
9 8 Harvard 21 4 4 58.62 2 -20.18 42 38.44
10 10 New Hampshire 22 12 2 27.78 12 9.52 20 37.29
11 11 Mass-Lowell 21 8 7 36.11 6 -0.91 29 35.20
12 13 Western Michigan 22 11 3 30.56 9 1.26 26 31.82
13 12 Michigan State 21 11 5 27.03 13 4.15 24 31.18
14 14 Northeastern 19 11 6 22.22 15 8.32 21 30.54
15 15 Maine 17 15 4 5.56 23 18.13 9 23.69
16 17 Miami 20 15 1 13.89 20 5.82 23 19.71
17 16 Alaska-Anchorage 15 19 2 -11.11 29 26.77 3 15.66
18 19 RPI 19 9 4 31.25 7 -17.80 38 13.45
19 22 Clarkson 17 8 5 30.00 10 -16.96 37 13.04
20 18 Denver 15 20 3 -13.16 30 22.57 6 9.41
21 24 Bowling Green 18 16 2 5.56 23 2.90 25 8.45
22 20 Boston College 15 16 5 -2.78 26 10.04 19 7.26
23 21 Minnesota-Duluth 14 21 3 -18.42 31 25.06 4 6.64
24 23 Alaska-Fairbanks 19 13 0 18.75 17 -15.36 33 3.39
25 25 North Dakota 11 23 4 -31.58 38 29.37 1 -2.21
26 28 Michigan Tech 12 25 5 -30.95 37 27.97 2 -2.98
27 26 Brown 15 11 4 13.33 21 -16.40 36 -3.07
28 27 Vermont 14 12 6 6.25 22 -15.33 32 -9.08
29 29 Providence 11 21 3 -28.57 34 13.69 12 -14.88
30 31 Union 12 11 4 3.70 25 -20.09 41 -16.39
31 30 Merrimack 11 20 2 -27.27 33 10.79 17 -16.48
32 32 Ferris State 13 24 1 -28.95 35 10.21 18 -18.74
33 33 Notre Dame 10 22 5 -32.43 39 11.19 15 -21.25
34 34 Colgate 13 16 2 -9.68 28 -17.90 39 -27.58
35 35 Illinois-Chicago 10 27 2 -43.59 45 11.97 13 -31.62
36 36 Ohio State 6 21 5 -46.88 47 11.64 14 -35.24
37 37 Kent 10 26 2 -42.11 43 6.70 22 -35.41
38 39 Cornell 8 17 5 -30.00 36 -8.49 30 -38.49
39 38 Princeton 9 15 3 -22.22 32 -21.21 43 -43.43
40 40 St Lawrence 10 21 0 -35.48 41 -16.30 35 -51.79
41 41 Air Force 7 15 0 -36.36 42 -18.06 40 -54.42
42 42 Dartmouth 5 21 1 -59.26 49 -12.99 31 -72.24
43 43 Yale 5 21 1 -59.26 49 -15.93 34 -75.19
44 44 *Canisius 3 1 0 50.00 4 -140.58 48 -90.58
45 45 *Mass-Amherst 5 6 0 -9.09 27 -91.31 45 -100.40
46 46 Army 6 16 0 -45.45 46 -60.78 44 -106.24
47 47 *U Connecticut 2 4 0 -33.33 40 -115.50 46 -148.83
48 48 *Fairfield 3 2 1 16.67 19 -180.66 51 -164.00
49 49 *Villanova 2 5 0 -42.86 44 -148.16 50 -191.01
50 50 *Holy Cross 1 4 0 -60.00 51 -133.66 47 -193.66
51 51 *Iona 1 5 1 -57.14 48 -143.89 49 -201.03
PERFORMANCE is based on won-lost record only; game sites and margin of victory
are not considered, for example. Performance ranges from +100 (for an
undefeated and untied team) to -100 (for a winless and untied team), with
a .500 winning percentage getting a zero performance.
SCHEDULE is the average rating of a team's opponents.
RATING is the sum of performance and schedule and represents an evaluation of
how each team has done so far with respect to the rest of college hockey.
Based on 773 Division I games. Includes all Division I teams. * = not eligible
for the NCAA tournament
In accordance with NCAA statistical by-laws, the original results from Maine's
forfeited games are used.
Please note that TCHCR is not the same as the Rating Percentage Index used by
the NCAA Ice Hockey Selection Committee. But TCHCR will be treating the Maine
forfeits the same way for consistency.
|
|
|