HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kevin Todd <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Dec 1996 14:14:23 -0800
Reply-To:
Kevin Todd <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Ok, I'm not sure if this formatting is going to send ok...I hope it does
because it is quite interesting to compare some of the current team power
plays/kills...
 
 ______________OVERALL_______________||__________ECAC_________________
|TEAM  PP  G   PP %   PK   G   PK %  || PP   G   PP %   PK   G   PP % |
|COR   41  13  31.7%  49   9   81.6% || 37  11   29.7%  48   8   83.3%|
|CLG   58  16  27.6%  67  15   77.6% || 38   6   15.8%  37   7   81.1%|
|BRW   51  14  27.5%  60  16   73.3% || 37  11   29.7%  42  11   73.8%|
|SLU   54  11  20.4%  55   8   85.5% || 25   7   28.0%  20   5   75.0%|
|CLK   69  13  18.8%  74   7   90.5% || 22   4   18.2%  36   3   91.7%|
|RPI   56  10  17.9%  54   8   85.2% || 20   3   15.0%  22   4   81.8%|
|UNI   40   7  17.5%  39   5   87.2% || 22   4   18.2%  23   3   87.0%|
|DRT   48   8  16.7%  44   8   81.8% || 37   7   18.9%  30   6   80.0%|
|PRN   47   7  14.9%  53   7   86.8% || 41   6   14.6%  44   6   86.4%|
|YAL   41   6  14.6%  33   9   72.7% || 41   6   14.6%  33   9   72.7%|
|UVM   84  12  14.3%  80  14   82.5% || 36   5   13.9%  32   7   78.1%|
|HAR   57   2   3.5%  48   5   89.6% || 40   2    5.0%  34   3   91.2%|
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I always have to search for this kind of information on the net and can
never seem to find it, so I just decided to do it myself...the % are all
rounded to the nearest tenth and most of the numbers should be accurate;)
as all the # came from box scores on the net.  I have been shocked all
season by the unbelievably bad Harvard power play (at least
statistically)...can it really be *that* bad??  Under 4%?  Granted, their
kill is quite good and it shows that they are a rather defensive, low
scoring team...but how can you win with bad a PP?  As well, I am
surprised by Vermont's PP...after having 84 attempts, they have only
scored 14% of the time...I had expect their PP to be a bit better...it
certainly can't be said that they havn't had enough chances:)
 
Anyway, pull your own conclusions from the info...and:
 
***Please let me know if this is useful to you...if even a few people
like it then I will either e-mail you the info off-line, or I will just
post it every week...If not, I will not bother to put it on-line***
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2