HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Glen Keeney <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 May 1994 09:34:38 EDT
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
  In lieu of a longer response I had planned:
First choice: No overtime
Second choice: Unlimited overtime
 
Facetious choice (prompted by Arthur Mintz scoring proposal:
  Win in regulation  2 points
  Win in overtime    1 point, 0 for loser
  Tie    1 point each
 
(As to 2nd choice, that is not feasible for college hockey.)
 
Not so facetious: After EVERY game (there are no OTs) a shootout that
has no bearing on team standings.  Maybe this could be spunoff as a
separate sport.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2