In a message dated 12/30/02 5:06:18 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<<
At 11:57 AM 12/27/05 -0500, Daniel Pearlman wrote:
>Stoner,
>You have to remember that most of the members of this list, at least of the
>active ones, have a professional investment in Pound studies. This fact
>bodes ill for any objective assessment of Pound's literary worth coming
>from this group. I'm afraid you'll have to rest content in your own
>judgment, which I hope you'll always keep open to challenge. Or else wait
>fifty years and see if the universities have still managed to keep Pound
>relevant and alive.
>==Dan P >>
(con't)
then why does DP rate a whack? I suppose it only applies to those with a