Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Ralph N. Baer |
Date: | Mon, 3 Feb 1997 06:55:49 EST |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Dr Martin G. Keeney" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> ECAC Tournament:
> Omit #11-#12; then 7 vs 10 and 8 vs 9 single games;
> reseed then 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, and 4 vs 5;
> 2 games with 5 minute overtimes; if then tied, 1 game with 20 minute OTs.
> reseed, then; 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3; then consolation and final.
> Tiebreakers: Bill Fenwick - Oct 1995
> 1 Head-to-head; not tournaments. 4 Goal differential, head-to-head.
> 2 Record against top 4 teams. 5 Goal differential vs top four.
> 3 Record against top 8 teams. 6 Goal differential vs top eight.
> Based on current standings: Omit ----> 12 Brwn 11 Yale
> 7 Havd 8 Unin 1 Crnl 2 RPI 3 VT 4 Prnc
> 10 Dart 9 StLw 8 New 8 7 New 7 6 Clgt 5 Clks
*****************************************************************************
I have never claimed to understand tie-breaking rules, and obviously
a lot can change in the next four weeks, but shouldn't RPI currently be
seated #1 based upon their victory in Ithaca over that other team that
wears Red?
Ralph Baer
RPI '68, '70, '74
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|