Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 9 Nov 1998 08:33:39 -0600 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I do not know of any Pound translation of Canto 73. I wasn't given
any version when I was asked to silently edit the English version of
Canto 72 that now appears in the ND edition.
Tim Redman
On Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:25:45 -0600 James Atkinson
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> To all:
>
> I notice that when James McLaughlin published Pound's own "trot"
> translation of Canto 72 in the Fall 1993 edition of _The Paris Review_
> (307-317) he noted that there had been a rumor in the Pound family that
> EP had translated Canto *73* as well as the now-available 72, but that
> the translation had not been found.
>
> Is this still the case? Or is Massimo Bacigalupo's _Paideuma_
> translation of Canto 73 (20:1-2 (Spring, Fall 1991): 16-19) still the
> prevailing (or at least the most widely available) translation?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> James Atkinson
> [log in to unmask]
> 11/7/1998
>
>
> ----------------- End Forwarded Message -----------------
Tim Redman
School of Arts and Humanities, JO 31
University of Texas at Dallas
P.O. Box 830688
Richardson, TX 75083-0688
(972) 883-2775 (o)
(972) 883-2989 (fax)
|
|
|