Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 31 Jul 1996 17:42:19 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 03:46 PM 7/31/96 -0400, Jim Love wrote:
> Yes indeed it's a harsh penalty, but how is it that the man in charge
>when the infractions (that precipitated the harsh penalty to begin with)
>were committed has escaped NC$$ sanctions ??
Not that I don't think Shawn Walsh shouldn't have been greater
penalized (at this point, I haven't made up my mind), you can't say that he
escaped NC$$ sanctions, he just managed to keep his job. Keep in mind, he
was suspended for one year by the school. The NC$$ just figured one year's
enough. And his program is being hit hard. For a coach, I'd imagine that,
while not as bad as being fired, sanctions against the program that you run
such as this is pretty devastating.
-Josh
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|