Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 1995 17:03:23 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Eric,
Apparently, you have already made your mind up about how
"pathetic" the ECAC is, even though I suspect that most of your knowledge
of the league is based on the records and/or power ratings of its teams.
However, I'm not going to argue about this. I just want remind everyone
of the purpose of Hockey-L, which is intelligent discussion; NOT to voice
opinions on which teams, players, schools, or leagues are "pathetic"
(refer to your "Usage Guidelines for Hockey-L" file). If you have such
opinions, fine. But keep them to yourself and keep them off Hockey-L
because all it does is antagonize people on the list. Can we please try
to get along?
Sincerely,
Tony Garcia
On Mon, 27 Feb 1995, Eric J Burton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 1995, C. Sammy Hager wrote:
>
> > Final ECAC standings after this weekend
> > 1) Clarkson 13-6-3 29
> > 2) Brown 13-7-2 28
> > 3) Harvard 13-8-1 27
> > 4) Vermont 11-9-2 24
> > 5) Colgate 11-9-2 24
> > 6) Princeton 10-9-3 23
> > 7) RPI 10-9-3 23
> > 8) Cornell 9-10-3 21
> > 9) St. Lawrence 10-12-0 20
> > 10)Dartmouth 7-13-2 16
> > 11)Union 6-12-4 16
> > 12)Yale 6-13-3 15
>
> I would take anybody in the WCHA over these teams. This is patetic
> When I look at he Power rating I shake my head. Hell Play some games
> against someone tough...
>
|
|
|