HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Michael Neal" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
J. Michael Neal
Date:
Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:24:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Kaplan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Zach Parise Inks a Deal with the Devil(s)


> The problem is, the players won't be on strike. The owners will lock out
the players without a CBA in place. That is a major difference. Management
can send a young player down to the minors, so that he will get some playing
time and experience, even while the big club is shut down. None of the
players would be referred to as "scabs" in that situation, since there'd be
no picket line to cross.


Based upon the research I did in regard to baseball's labor problems, there
is no distinction between a strike and a lockout in this regard.  When
management institutes a lockout, they do so against the bargaining unit, not
against a particular subset thereof.

J. Michael Neal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2