Dave Hendrickson writes:
>
>While I can appreciate the interest in penalties, to denigrate USCHO's
>overall coverage for this one failing we simply can't avoid right now
>seems akin to saying, "Doesn't that facial mole make Cindy Crawford look
>ugly?"  :-)
 
USCHO is NOT to hockey writing what Cindy Crawford is to female beauty.
 
More seriously, folks keep talking about the length of time it takes to
list the penalties.  How many people are compiling these box scores - 1 per
league, 2 per league?  If that is the case, why doesn't USCHO have
stringers at each game just feed them the complete box score.  It can't be
that hard to do.
 
Not to stereotype, but most of the people who get involved in Hockey-L seem
to have a statistical bent.  Penalty stats are important in understanding
the flow of the game.  I really don't understand why there is such a
reluctance.
 
Greg Ambrose
>
>-------------------------------------------------
>Dave Hendrickson     [log in to unmask]
>Hockey East writer for U.S. College Hockey Online
>         http://www.uscollegehockey.com
>
>HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
>[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.