Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 11 Feb 1997 09:33:52 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Feb 1997, Stickney Brian CDT wrote:
>I have two points to raise for possible discussions..
>
>1) Unlike the other major college sports, in college hockey it is almost
>impossible for an independent to make it to the big show. While one may argue
>that the level of competition would drop...I don't think that is the case.
>Teams like Mankato St., Air Force, and Army have all played their division one
>leagued opponents tough at times. Wouldn't it make the tourney a bit more
>interesting if even one of these independents had an at large bid into the
>tourney (based on best record of the independents). Perhaps we would see the
>same sort of upsets in the college hockey as we see in College basketball
>(Princeton upsetting UCLA, etc...)
>
If an independent that wouldn't normally get in is selected, then someone
more qualified gets bumped. I don't like that idea. If an independent
is good enough to get in, then they should have the record to make it in the
first place.
I think the answers you receive regarding the strongest rivalry will be
greatly affected by regional bias.
-Alan Harder
[log in to unmask]
Go Blue!
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|