ME-HOCKEY Archives

The Maine Hockey Discussion List

ME-HOCKEY@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Wayne T. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:32:13 EST
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask], Dale Duff and Dan Hannigan <[log in to unmask]>, Marcus Day <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
The Maine Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (128 lines)
Heal Point System Rank for Men's Division I College Hockey, through 02/20/1999.
Compiled by Wayne T. Smith
 
This report includes results from 708 Division I games.
 
     Last
Rank Week School          Played   Record      P.I.     T.I.
 1     1  North Dakota       30   26- 2- 2    36.00   172.97 W34,W34
 2     2  Maine              28   21- 3- 4    32.86   161.34 W20,L20
 3     3  New Hampshire      31   23- 5- 3    31.61   148.92 W37,T5
 4     4  Michigan State     31   22- 3- 6    32.26   148.66 W14,W10
 5     5  Boston College     32   19-10- 3    25.63   132.78 W28,T3
 6     8  Clarkson           28   18- 9- 1    26.43   125.42 W31,W11
 7     6  Colorado College   32   21-10- 1    26.88   120.19 W15,L15
 8    11  St Lawrence        30   18- 9- 3    26.00   119.97 W11,T31
 9    10  Ohio State         35   19-12- 4    24.00   116.91 W21,L45
10     9  Michigan           32   17- 9- 6    25.00   113.36 T43,L4
11     7  Princeton          25   15- 9- 1    24.80   109.76 L8,L6
12    14  Quinnipiac         21   15- 4- 2    30.48   106.89 W--,W30,L30
13    13  Niagara            19    8- 8- 3    20.00   105.98 W--,W--
14    12  Notre Dame         31   16-11- 4    23.23   105.91 L4,L24
15    15  Denver             30   16-12- 2    22.67   105.68 L7,W7
16    16  Northern Michigan  32   18-10- 4    25.00   104.90 T41,W41
17    20  Rensselaer         28   18- 9- 1    26.43    99.63 W27,W35
18    19  Providence         30   17-13- 0    22.67    96.90 W46
19    22  Colgate            28   14-10- 4    22.86    96.52 W32,W40
20    23  Boston University  31   12-16- 3    17.42    95.53 L2,W2
21    18  Ferris State       30   13-12- 5    20.67    91.52 L9,L36
22    21  Cornell            25   11-11- 3    20.00    90.69 W40,L32
23    17  Connecticut        21   12- 7- 2    24.76    88.56 W51,W51
24    28  Bowling Green      30   13-14- 3    19.33    86.72 W14
25    26  MSU-Mankato        27   11-12- 4    19.26    86.09 W--,W39
26    27  St Cloud           30   12-13- 5    19.33    84.98 T29,T29
27    24  Vermont            27   12-13- 2    19.26    84.11 L17,W49
28    25  Mass Lowell        31   16-15- 0    20.65    81.33 L5,L42
29    29  Minnesota          34   10-16- 8    16.47    79.57 T26,T26
30    35  Holy Cross         22   11- 9- 2    21.82    79.15 L12,W12
31    31  Yale               25   10-12- 3    18.40    76.93 L6,T8
32    34  Harvard            23    9-12- 2    17.39    75.62 L19,W22
33    33  Wisconsin          31   12-16- 3    17.42    73.91 W44,L44
34    30  Alaska-Anchorage   32   13-14- 5    19.38    73.71 L1,L1
35    32  Dartmouth          23    9-13- 1    16.52    71.56 W49,L17
36    39  Miami              32   10-17- 5    15.63    71.25 W45,W21
37    37  Northeastern       30    9-18- 3    14.00    67.33 L3
38    40  Canisius           18    5- 9- 4    15.56    65.32 W--,W--
39    36  Air Force          17    5-11- 1    12.94    64.17 W--,L25
40    38  Brown              25    7-13- 5    15.20    61.52 L22,L19
41    41  Lake Superior      32    8-20- 4    12.50    58.28 T16,L16
42    42  Mass Amherst       30   10-18- 2    14.67    57.87 W50,W28
43    44  Western Michigan   30    5-17- 8    12.00    55.08 T10
44    45  Michigan Tech      32    9-22- 1    11.88    52.63 L33,W33
45    47  Alaska-Fairbanks   30    8-21- 1    11.33    50.10 L36,W9
46    43  Merrimack          30   10-19- 1    14.00    49.53 L18
47    46  Minnesota-Duluth   32    7-21- 4    11.25    45.61 -
48    48  Iona               18    8- 8- 2    20.00    40.70 T50,W--,W--
49    49  Union              28    3-22- 3     6.43    28.07 L35,L27
50    50  Army               17    2-14- 1     5.88    19.30 T48,L42,W--
51    51  Fairfield          20    0-20- 0     1.00     0.00 L23,L23
 
 
Average ranking of each league(#teams):
 
               This week Last week
  WCHA(09):      26.22     25.78
   HEA(09):      22.33     22.11
  CCHA(11):      23.91     24.36
  ECAC(12):      24.75     24.75
  MAAC(06):      33.67     34.17
   IND(04):      31.75     31.25
 
 
 
Average rating of each league(#teams):
 
               This week Last week
  WCHA(09):      89.87     88.68
   HEA(09):      99.02     99.20
  CCHA(11):      91.12     88.55
  ECAC(12):      86.61     85.85
  MAAC(06):      63.40     61.75
   IND(04):      68.83     66.38
 
 
 
On this ranking ...
 
This ranking uses games played by NCAA Division I teams eligible for
consideration to the NCAA Division I Men's Ice Hockey Championships.
Specifically excluded this season are the University of Nebraska-Omaha,
as they are in their last year as an "emerging" NCAA Division I program,
and the two Division II teams from the MAAC (Sacred Heart and American
International).
 
On "The Heal Point System" ...
 
The Heal Point System is used to rank secondary schools in Maine in
several sports.  The Heal Point System was developed many years ago by
Durwood Heal to rank Maine secondary school basketball teams.
 
On the Maine secondary school calculation ...
 
"P.I." stands for "Preliminary Index".  "P.I." is calculated for each
team by giving a team 40 points for each win and 20 points for each tie,
and then dividing by the number of scheduled games.  Minimum "P.I." is
1.00.
 
"T.I." stands for "Tournament Index" and is used to rank the teams.
"T.I." is calculated for each team by summing the "P.I." of the
opponents for each win, one half the "P.I." for each tie, then dividing
by the number of games scheduled and then multiplying by 10.
 
Note: This Division I college hockey "Heal Point System" ranking uses
   the number of games played instead of the number of games scheduled.
   Since all games in Division I college hockey are normally played,
   there is no difference between this and the traditional Heal Point
   System at end of season and this method produces better preliminary
   results.
 
Game scores for this ranking have been provided by US College Hockey
Online, sometimes supplemented by other sources.  USCHO's composite of
all Division I men's ice hockey games is available at
 
      http://www.uscollegehockey.com/
 
in the section marked schedules and then Division I composite schedule.
 
Copyright 1999 by Wayne T. Smith                         [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2