Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:46:10 -0700 |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I managed to lose the bolding, italicizing, and font madness in the
original post, so here is a second try that shows the FARs are on the
right side of this issue.
the FACULTY ATHLETICS REPRESENTATIVES ASSOCIATION Preliminary Report
of the 2003-04 Division III Legislative Review Committee recommends
stances by Faculty Athletics Representatives in advising their
institutions on how to vote on legislation at the NCAA convention.
The full recommendations can be found at
http://www.elon.edu/ncaafara/LRC%20DIIIREPORT2003-04.htm
of interest is the following excerpt:
No. 2-69 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP- MULTIDIVISION CLASSIFICATION -
AWARDING OF ATHLETICS AID
Intent:
To eliminate the waiver that permits a Division III
institution that conducted a sport classified in Division I in
1982-83 to award athletically related financial aid in that
sport, as well as a sport for the opposite gender, later
reclassified to Division I.
Advantages:
The prohibition against athletics aid is the defining
philosophical tenet of Division III. It should apply
consistently to all Division III members.
Disadvantages:
Less than 2% of current Division III member institutions and
roughly 250 participating student athletes operate under this
waiver. These institutions have developed identities through
the success of their Division I sport that greatly impact
recruitment among the general student population as well as
alumni relations and gift-giving. Elimination of this waiver
may create an undue burden on these member institutions.
Recommendation: Oppose
Eliminating the waiver will impose a burden on the affected
institutions in terms of potential damage to their
institutional identities, while no significant benefit will
accrue to other membership institutions.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] http://cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369
|
|
|