Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Mar 1997 12:56:45 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Organization: |
Who has time to be organized? |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Charlie Shub wrote:
> now there is difficulty as in both regions both the 2/3 and 1/4
> matchups are intra conference. Moreover, if the favorites win, 2 of
> the 4 quarter finals would be replays of this evening's games.
>
> were it me, i'd swap 3 and 4 on both
> sides send cornell west and cc and denver east.
>
> New Hampshire cornell
> Denver Miami
> Clarkson North Dakota
> BU Michigan
> vermont Minnesota
> colorado Michigan State
>
> one could easily reverse denver and cc
> the 4 wcha teams are in 4 brackets
> the 3 ecac teams are in 3 brackets
> the 3 ccha teams are in two brackets
I don't think that this is the format that the NCAA will come up with,
but if it is, I would very strongly object as a Gopher fan. Minnesota
finished far ahead of Miami in the PWR rankings (4th vs. 10th). I do
not think that it would be at all proper to reward that by putting them
up against a team that seems to be the overwhelming pick as the best in
the country. This draw pits the #1 and #4 seeds in the overall rankings
in the quarterfinals. If the NCAA puts that high a priority on avoiding
conference match-ups, then something is wrong.
J. Michael Neal
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|