Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 1995 12:21:10 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Just a few thoughts on today's postings:
>Subject: Brown 3 - UML 3
>Lowell had leads of 2-0 and 3-2 before ending up with a tie at >Brown last
night. This game was pretty unremarkable - it >looked to me that both teams
had the "this is the last >non-conference game of the year before we hit the
>home-stretch, let's coast through this one" attitude. This
>attitude may have been a bit more prevelant among the Lowell >team as they
lookked VERY sloppy at times. I was a little >dissapointed in the
lackadaisicalness (is that a word?), >because, in my mind, it was an
important game for both >teams.
I couldn't agree more with the fact that the game was important. Don't these
guys know about the power ratings?
[log in to unmask] . wrote:
>We turn the spotlight this week on the New Hampshire >Wildcats. A look at
the media polls (WMEB and Troy Record) >shows that, while the polls are
similar, HOCKEY-L is taking >more notice of New Hampshire than the other
polls are:
> Troy HOCKEY-L WMEB Record
> Team Record Rank Rank Rank
>New Hampshire 15-5-3 7 10 10
>This week's ratings composite (note that the computerized >rankings aren't
letting the Wildcats go by unnoticed):
> HOCKEY-L RPICH CHODR KRACH HEAL
> Team Record Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank
>New Hampshire 15-5-3 7 6 9 5 6
It's about time someone noticed the 'Cats!!
Andrew Weise <[log in to unmask]> comments on Chaz Scoggins' poll as
follows:
>Chaz should also take a look at where he put Clarkson (6) & >New Hampshire
(7). The Wildcats beat Clarkson twice this >season, where both teams were
playing real well at each >time. Go figure.... Polls, polls, polls,......
Despite Mike M's thoughtful response comparing UNH's (3-2-1, Mike, not 3-3)
and Clarkson's (5-1) records over the last 6 games), UNH's beating Clarkson
twice should count for something.
I'll try to post UNH-BU results tonight after the game.
Karen Ambrose, UNH '72
Go Blue, Beat BU!!
|
|
|