Have you guys ever heard " WHATS DONE IS DONE" or how about this one "FORGET
ABOUT IT" .
Lets be thankfull that MAINE has WON the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP and that the
past is finally behind them.
If you want to keep this issue going, PLEASE do it by private e-mail,
because (like everyone else) I'm tired of recieving e-mails on this
subject!!
Original Message-----
From: Mike Machnik <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sunday, April 11, 1999 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: "scandal" (was Re: More from Anaheim Visit)
 
 
>Dan, I think the important point here is "take the high road" as many other
>Maine folks have done.  It is not good to continue the chain of unfair
>accusations and doesn't help the cause.
>
>You may take issue with the public comments I made, but it was only in
>response to comments you also made publicly and which are certainly open to
>rebuttal.
>
>I see that you still have a number of questions...my suggestion would be to
>obtain answers to those questions instead of making the kind of
>inflammatory and unfounded accusations you made.  Again it is not at all
>unlike what you are rightly upset at other folks for doing with regard to
>Maine.
>
>I find it rather interesting that you challenged me for not responding to
>other comments made in another forum and then saw fit to censor my original
>message, including all but this point which you did not seem to want people
>to see again:
>
>> And as many of you know, I am not affiliated with either UNH or Maine,
and
>> have in the past come to the defense of Maine when unfounded accusations
>> were made against them.  This is no different.
>
>As you well know since you have been around for a while, if you check the
>archives dating back several years, you will find many more examples of me
>speaking up on Maine's behalf when unfair accusations were made against
>Maine.  I may not follow all of the same forums that you do nor have the
>time or inclination to respond to everything or rehash things that have
>already been gone over time and time again.  So I resent your implication
>that I am following a double standard here.  The facts prove otherwise and
>you are well aware of this.
>
>On posting private email, as you know I have not sent you any messages, nor
>do I intend to, so your threat to post email is a moot point.  I do not
>have a problem with stating my opinion publicly.  However I must thank you
>for admitting that you do not share the same notions of etiquette as most
>people and that posting confidential messages is okay for you as long as it
>furthers your agenda, apparently much like posting inflammatory and
>unfounded accusations.  Whether or not you state up front that you will
>post email, it is not ethical and does not absolve you of your
>responsibility.  This will not affect me since there will be no such
>messages from me for you to post, but fortunately others can take it into
>account from now on.
>