Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:26:33 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is the first reply to this I have read, so if I spout off too soon, oh well. " I think it's too early to say", I think the lack of leadership, discipline, drive, etc etc exemplified over the last 2 years at different occasions speaks volumes.......
This isn't meant to be a pissing match. Each of us has opinions of who is what. I am quite sure Tim has exeptional qualifications of being the head coach, there is no question there. I also believe that the results of what they each do have had "different than we are used to" results, that's all.
>
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Date: 2004/03/02 Tue AM 07:51:15 EST
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Rant on Shields Quote
>
> In a message dated 3/1/2004 6:49:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > Nobody ever said there was never a let down. Where the hell did that come
> > from?!?!?!?! I think Shawn was a tougher coach than Tim, thats all.
> >
>
> Shawn and Tim are very different as people, and I presume as coaches, as
> well. Tim does not yell a lot, Shawn was known to raise is voice on occasion.
> Tim is not as flamboyant, either personally or in his coaching style. Faced
> with the same coaching situation, my guess is that Shawn's decibel level would
> be higher than Tim's. But does that mean that Shawn is "tougher"? Or that he
> would get better results? I don't know. At the very least, I think it's too
> early to say.
>
>
|
|
|