At 05:18 PM 11/29/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Folks.. I guess it wasn't his last word.. had to get another jab in.
>Again, this is from Greg Ambrose [log in to unmask] and you should
>respond to both [log in to unmask] and [log in to unmask]
>should you wish.
>It's not my job, it's the Globe reporter's.  I just made note of an
>article
>which appeared in New England's largest newspaper.  The fact that it did
>automatically lends some credibility to the points made in the article.
> If
>you have a bone to pick, pick it with them.
 
Sorry Greg, but the fact that anything is printed in the Globe doesn't add
credibility to it. The Globe is noted more for sensationalism than fact.
Just because THE INQUIRER is read nation-wide doesn't make alien abductions
a factual reality. The author, who chose to take two unrelated situations
(the NC$$ Sanctions and decreasing enrollment), drew an erroneous
conclusion and hoped he could dupe you and numerous other biased readers
into agreeing with his faulty equation. You read what you WANTED to read
and it's YOUR opinion we are reading on the LIST. The fact that you base
your opinion on a faulty equation and a questionable source makes you
equally inaccurate. You're entitled to your opinion...prudence is knowing
your facts and when and when not to express it.
 
 
***********************
Frank Lisnik
"Talk less, say more."
***********************