HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Lisko/HCS/CSC <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Craig Lisko/HCS/CSC <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jul 1996 12:00:33 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Let me start by agreeing that the most effective way of refereeing is the
current CCHA method. And I will explain why.
 
Being a previous player in the CCHA, the one referee system offers many
benefits.
 
1. The players will know when they see the ONE referee what type of game its
going to be.  Each referee has his owen style. Some will allow more stick work,
others will allow harder hitting and some call everything. But when a player
knows that only ONE referee is going to call the majority (99%) of the
penalties, and they know what he calls, the game is more enjoyable for everyone.
 
2. Linesman in the CCHA have the authority to call penalties behind the play.
Normally these are two guys giving it to one another up the ice. The linesman
can also call major penalties. They do not have a huge impact on the game and
they should be allowed to make these calls.
 
This is just my opinion, and having played in various conferences during
tournaments, two referees can simply cause too much confusion. Referees will
tend to try and cover for the other and usually more questionable calls are
made.
 
By no means am I bashing the referees, but a three man (one ref and two
linesman) is the way the players would rather have it.
 
Craig
 
Ferris State University
1990-1994
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2