You get the main point buddy. UVM will win...
On Sun, 27 Feb 1994, Glenn W. Gale wrote:
> "C. Sammy Hager" <[log in to unmask]> wrote...
>
> >1) Clarkson 13-6-3 29
> >2) Brown 13-7-2 28
> >3) Harvard 13-8-1 27
> >4) Vermont 11-9-2 24
> >5) Colgate 11-9-2 24
> >6) RPI 10-9-3 23
> >7) Princeton 10-9-3 23
> >8) Cornell 9-10-3 21
> >9) St. Lawrence 10-12-0 20
> >10)Dartmouth 7-13-2 16
> >11)Union 6-12-4 16
> >12)Yale 6-13-3 15
>
> >1st round playoffs
> >Princeton 5-Dartmouth 1
> >Cornell 2-SLU 1
>
> >2nd round
> >UVM 8-Colgate 6 (2-1)
> >Harvard 5-RPI 3 (2-1)
> >Brown 3-Princeton 1 (2-1)
> >Clarkson 4- Cornell 0 (2-0)
>
> >ECAC final UVM 3-Clarkson 2 OT (2-1)
> >Go Cats Go!!!
> >See ya at Lake Placid!
>
> In addition to the discrepancies in the above final standings
> pointed out by Bill Fenwick, the predicted playoff results would
> necessitate UVM playing Clarkson in the semifinals (#1 vs. #4 seed,
> and #2 vs. #3), not the final.
>
>
> -Glenn
>