Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:33:18 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Okay, let's get really pickey here! :-)
At the time the puck was coming under the goaltender, no SCSCU player had
"possession" it deflected off of Blackburn. So, how does the rule apply
then?
HOCKEY!!!! -- GO GOPHERS!!!
kam
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Benjamin J. Flickinger
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:32 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: rules question
>
>
> --- kam wrote:
> I agree, Mark. The SCSU player was not "standing" in the crease when the
> goal went in. He was moving through that corner of it. He was not
> interferring with the play. I say it was a goal.
> --- end of quote ---
>
> The NCAA does not use the new NHL rule which allows for discretion of the
> referee regarding interference. You yourself say he was "moving
> through that
> corner of it." That seems to pretty much qualify him as "skating
> through the
> goal crease while the attacking team has possession of the puck."
>
> Therefore, no goal is the correct call.
|
|
|