Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 1993 10:21:19 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Seeing so many postings suggesting different playoff formats, I
thought I would share a way I have been amusing myself with for the
last few years. The League winner is seeded first, the Conference
Tourney winner is seeded second, and the other two spots are the next
highest seeds in the league.
Elimination Round (2 game total goal)((Despite the Goaltenders' Union))
Campus sites
HE1 h CC4 ME h MSU EC1 h WC4 Har h MTU
HE2 h CC3 BU h MI EC2 h WC3 Cla h Wis
CC1 h HE3 Mia h UNH WC1 h EC3 M-D h RPI
CC2 h HE4 LSS h UML WC2 h EC4 Min h Bro
(Conference cross-over would switch every year: ie. next year HE1 h WC4)
NCAA Regionals (2 sites) (Best 2 of 3 games)
East West
HE1 v WC2 ME v Min CC1 v HE2 Mia v BU (or MI)
EC1 v CC2 Har v LSS WC1 v EC2 M-D v Cla (or Wis)
NCAA Final Four (1 game)
"HE1" v "WC1" ME v M-D "EC1" v "CC1" LSS v Mia
Final: ME v Mia (Maine still wins 9-6!)
I see that NMU does not make it this way, which I would have to say
is a shame, since they are playing so well. However the strength
of this method is that its all automatic. Each team knows exactly
what it has to do.
_____________
/
good shooting
rhun
_____________/
|
|
|