HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Benjamin J. Flickinger" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Benjamin J. Flickinger
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 00:07:45 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
1-1 tie. Apparently Dartmouth's offense decided to take the night off again,
going 0-fer on the power play yet again and not getting any sustained pressure
after the half way point of the game.

Outside of their goalie, Princeton didn't impress me at all. They played a lot
of clutch and grab and although they had more quality chances in the third and
OT than Dartmouth did if it was possible their offense looked even more anemic
than Dartmouth's did. They had wide open nets to shoot at and just plain blew
it, shooting it into Boucher or missing the net by feet. And other times they
were running into each other, falling down, and plain missing the puck.

Ugly game for Dartmouth, in front of what was definitely the largest student
crowd of the year (it was the tennis ball game, afterall), though the arena as
a whole probably still wasn't as full as the UVM game. Will be interesting to
see what kind of crowd shows up tomorrow to root on the Big Green toward
(hopefully) an Ivy Title against Yale. A tie will assure Dartmouth a split of
the title with Cornell and possibly Hahvahd, a win will give Dartmouth the
title outright.

Baldwin got the goal that sent the tennis balls flying, Parros tied it up for
Princeton on a shot that I have no idea how it got past Boucher. And looking at
the box score it was listed as an official sellout of 4500(+) people, though it
still didn't look as full as the UVM game except in the student section.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2