HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"The College Hockey Computer Rating" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Feb 1992 20:48:57 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
The College Hockey Computer Rating
compiled by Keith Instone
 
NOTE: TCHCR is *not* used in conjunction with the NCAA selection process.
 
Includes games on 2/22/92. Last week's ranking includes games on 2/15/92.
 
     Last                      Division I          Schedule Schedule
Rank Week Team                   Record    Rating  Strength   Rank
  1    2  Michigan              25  6  3    85.55    64.26      8
  2    3  Lake Superior         19  7  4    83.30    66.14      3
  3    1  Minnesota             26  8  0    83.27    62.30     15
  4    4  Maine                 24  3  2    74.70    45.62     28
  5    5  Michigan State        15  9  7    74.09    66.23      2
  6    7  Northern Michigan     18 13  3    71.87    64.06      9
  7    8  Western Michigan      16  9  5    71.72    63.16     13
  8    6  Wisconsin             17 11  2    69.92    62.83     14
  9    9  Boston University     20  6  4    64.69    47.92     24
 10   13  Miami                 14 14  4    62.88    63.53     11
 11   10  Alaska-Anchorage      17  7  1    61.59    45.97     27
 12   12  Minnesota-Duluth      13 15  2    60.99    64.06     10
 13   16  Illinois-Chicago      10 14  6    60.78    66.04      4
 14   11  Providence            20 10  2    59.83    47.60     25
 15   14  Michigan Tech         14 17  1    59.82    64.74      7
 16   15  North Dakota          16 15  1    59.72    59.20     18
 17   21  Colorado College      13 15  4    58.72    61.47     17
 18   20  Ferris State          10 14  7    58.56    64.88      6
 19   19  Harvard               14  4  6    57.83    41.72     35
 20   24  Clarkson              18  7  1    57.16    38.35     45
 21   23  New Hampshire         18 11  2    57.11    47.44     26
 22   17  Bowling Green          8 17  5    56.98    67.68      1
 23   22  St Cloud              12 15  1    56.78    62.14     16
 24   18  St Lawrence           17  8  1    54.45    39.17     41
 25   25  Ohio State             8 19  5    50.79    65.60      5
 26   26  Yale                  11  6  6    49.59    42.65     32
 27   30  Denver                 9 22  1    47.24    63.21     12
 28   28  Cornell               12  9  3    45.27    39.15     42
 29   27  Vermont               14 11  2    44.78    38.99     43
 30   31  Boston College        11 16  3    44.54    51.74     20
 31   29  UMass-Lowell           8 16  4    43.15    54.80     19
 32   35  Alaska-Fairbanks      13 16  0    39.98    43.10     31
 33   33  Northeastern          11 18  0    39.13    49.48     21
 34   34  Kent                   8 14  2    38.85    47.98     23
 35   32  RPI                   11 13  3    37.79    41.55     36
 36   37  Colgate               11 14  1    37.12    41.12     37
 37   36  Merrimack             12 18  0    35.61    43.25     30
 38   38  Brown                  9 14  4    35.37    41.86     34
 39   39  Princeton              9 13  1    34.39    40.69     38
 40   40  Alabama-Huntsville     8 11  0    32.61    38.76     44
 41   41  Notre Dame             6 17  0    27.76    48.78     22
 42   42  Dartmouth              2 20  2    14.08    43.81     29
 43   43  Air Force              3 19  0    12.39    39.19     40
 44   44  Union                  2 19  1    12.04    42.11     33
 45   45  Army                   2 14  0    10.20    39.67     39
 
The College Hockey Computer Rating uses a connected schedule graph and a
least squares optimization to rate the 45 Division I college hockey teams.
This method considers a team's opponents, and their opponents, etc., until
all 630 Division I games are included.
 
In addition to rating the teams, a strength of schedule is calculated for
each team. The schedule strength can be computed by averaging the ratings
of a team's opponents for each game.
 
For every game, the teams are evaluated based on: the outcome (win, lose,
tie); the margin of victory; percentage of goals allowed; the site of the
game (home, away, neutral ice); and overtime or regulation time.
 
Only games against other Division I teams are considered.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2