In article <[log in to unmask]>, Jayson Moy
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
>Therefore, the 2 teams from the ECAC should be Clarkson and, this is
>assuming that Clarkson makes the final, whomever wins the other semifinal.
>There is plenty of room for Colgate and RPI to move up in to the Top 15
>of the RPICH and justify this.  Teams losing in the quarterfinals will not
>be considered, even though Vermont and Brown are close to the
>Top 12 in the RPICH.
 
If Clarkson beats Princeton by a smaller margin than they win the final
game, it'll be tough to discount Princeton as a possible biddee if they
finish third, especially considering how high Princeton is in the RPICH.
If nothing else, Princeton will add some excitement- they're the kind of
team
that can beat anyone on a good day (as Maine people will tell you).  I
still can't understand how they finished with such a poor ECAC record- I
know they beat Brown, Harvard, and RPI during the season.  Did they just
play poorly against the lower-level teams?
 
--
 
- Andrew Brecher ([log in to unmask])  <insert disclaimer here>