HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Michael C. Machnik" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jan 1994 01:26:32 -0600
In-Reply-To:
Carol S White's message of Sun, 9 Jan 1994 21:38:25 CST <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
"Michael C. Machnik" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Since Carol and Wayne appear to have received contradicting information
from the people at their respective schools, my next question is,
could they both be right?  Perhaps Minnesota has implemented a
requirement beyond that declared by the NC$$ which makes it more
difficult for Minnesota players to return to their team following the
Olympics.
 
This would not be the first time something like this has happened.
For example, in 1988-89 and 1991-92, Merrimack had players who became
ineligible by the school's academic requirements, which are stricter
than those of the NC$$, while they would have remained eligible under
the NC$$ regulations.
---                                                                 ---
Mike Machnik                                          [log in to unmask]
Cabletron Systems, Inc.                                  *HMM* 11/13/93
<<<<<< Color Voice of the (9-9-1) Merrimack Warriors WCCM 800 AM >>>>>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2