HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:53:59 -0600
Reply-To:
Carol White <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
Carol White <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Organization:
University of Minnesota
Comments:
To: "Dale R. Thomas" <[log in to unmask]> cc: "Gary B. Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
No, if ONE person received TWO applications, then that one person
could improve their own priority.

Two people cannnot combine two applications with different names
to get a higher priority.

That is what I meant, okay?

-Carol

"Dale R. Thomas" wrote:

> At 08:58 PM 3/21/01 -0600, Carol S. White wrote:
> >...If you receive TWO applications, they can be
> >COMBINED to get a higher priority.
> >
> >Example:  one E and one B  equals  A priority.
>
> Carol,
>
> Someone in our group thought the web site explained that combined
> applications would be assigned the "lowest" priority of all the forms in
> the group.  I would be curious to hear how you determined the priority
> would be improved when they are combined.  We did notice that the only
> thing that varied on the form was the letter A through E.
>
> Dale

ATOM RSS1 RSS2