Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:54:00 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The recent threads discussing HEAL, CHODR, etc prompted me to resurrect my
attempt at a computer rating system. I reviewed my groundrules, made some
changes, and rewrote the program. Here are the tennets of my system:
1. Wins always add to your raw score.
2. Losses always subtract from your raw score.
3. Beating a good team is better than beating a bad team.
4. Losing to a bad team is worse than losing to a good team.
5. Ties count a half a win and half a loss.
Some implementation rules:
1. Total score is determined by dividing raw score by number of games.
2. Beating a team with a .800 winning percentage yields 4 times the raw
score contribution as beating a .200 team.
3. Losing to a .200 team yields 4 times the raw score decrement as losing
to an .800 team.
4. Only games vs other Div 1 schools count (i.e., only those with NC, WC,
CC, EC, or HE from the composite schedule).
The algorithm looks something like this:
1. Determine each team's winning percentage (win %) to date.
2. For each game played:
a) add to the winner's raw score the current win % of the losing team.
b) subtract from the loser's raw score the quantity (1 minus the
current win % of the winning team).
c) for ties, calculate the contribution to raw score if each team had
won and lost, then divide by 2
(this is equivalent to adding the opponent's win % and subtracting
0.5. I'll leave the math to you.)
3. Divide raw score by games played to come up with the first approximation
(which I'll call X).
4. Using X in place of win %, redo steps 2 and 3 to arrive at second
approximation (which I'll call Y).
The value X is equivalent to only looking at win % and opp win %. The value
Y is equivalent to taking opp opp % into account. I set out to determine Y,
which I think is the better gauge of a team. I'll show X too, since it
bears some merit, and it seems to approximate the HEAL rankings (Y
approximates RPICH).
Results: (games through 18 Dec 95):
ranked by X ranked by Y
Boston University Boston University
Minnesota Colorado College
Michigan Minnesota
Maine Maine
Vermont Michigan
Western Michigan Western Michigan
Colorado College Vermont
Lake Superior St. Denver
Clarkson Michigan State
Michigan State Providence
Denver Lake Superior St.
Providence Clarkson
Mass-Amherst Minnesota-Duluth
Bowling Green Bowling Green
Mass-Lowell Mass-Lowell
Minnesota-Duluth Mass-Amherst
St. Lawrence St. Lawrence
Comments welcome (privately, unless you want the whole list to know!)
Source code available.
Steve G
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|