Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 1997 09:11:22 -0500 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> Will he make a good NHL coach? No one really knows, but he can develop
>> young talent and that is a step in the right direction for the Bruins.
>
>But an NHL coach doesn't really do that -- he exploits the strengths of
>talent that is already established.
Actually, from what I've read and heard, Parker's teaching ability and
kinship with young players was one of his most attractive qualities to the
Bruins. The well-chronicled trade where Oates, Tocchet, and Ranford were
swapped for Carter, Allison, and Carey made the Bruins jump from the 6th
oldest team in the league to the 3rd youngest. With those young guys and
recent draft picks Kyle McLaren, Cameron Mann, Jonathan Aitken, and Joe
Thornton (we can hope, anyway), a coach with teaching ability would be
worlds ahead of a dictator like Mike Keenan in my book. Rooting for Parker
rather than against him would take some getting used to (I'm a fan of RPI
and Maine), but it's a transition I'm looking forward to.
Matt
RPI '94
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|