Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 1995 17:04:54 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
<v0151010aacb5e7857e5b@[10.0.2.15]> |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Oct 1995, Mike Machnik wrote:
One, if the ECAC continued to play 2 games vs each opponent,
> that gives teams 2x13=26 games, probably too many for the Ivies. And two,
> since neither of the two other Ivies (Penn & Columbia) seem close to
> elevating hockey to the ECAC I level, that would mean an imbalance of 8
> non-Ivies vs 6 Ivies - something I'm not sure the Ivies would agree to.
I've mentioned this before but not this season :-) Perhaps it is time
for the Ivies to go off into the corner and be by themselves with their
holier than thou attitude. IMO (no H here since I'm addressing this
topic) the HE/ECAC split was caused by just this issue of number of games
played. The Ivies are the tail that wags the dog. The operative rule
should be NC$$ guidelines. The travel issue for Niagara is another topic
entirely, but if the Ivies want their own rules, let them play in their
own league.
I'm even more fed up than I sound.
Arthur Berman BU'74, Harvard '90
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|