Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:31:15 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks. It looked to me as if the whole skate was in the area, and the
stick on the ice, too, so I figured the rule was not what I remembered.
Getting old.
TR
------------------------------
I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound
perspicacious.
------------------------------
On 3/26/2017 6:17 PM, Robert Woodbury wrote:
> If it’s the goal I think you’re talking about, the officials ruled he didn’t interfere with the goalie. He was on the edge of the blue. I believe they changed the rule a couple of years ago where they used to call interference if the toe of a boot was in the blue and the man wearing the boot was in the men’s room.
>
>> On Mar 26, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Why wasn't the goal disallowed for a man in the crease? I obviously don't understand the rule correctly.
>>
>> Tom Rowe
>> --
>> ------------------------------
>> I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound perspicacious.
>> ------------------------------
>>
|
|
|