Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Feb 1999 15:48:19 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of "Tue, 09 Feb 1999 12:06:24 EST."
<v03110702b2e5f7ed0ce1@[132.236.216.77]> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tuesday, February 9, 1999, Steven Rockey wrote:
>
> Doiron would call 2 minutes roughing and 10 minutes misconduct for each of
> these "fights". He could have called some of them 4 minutes for double
> roughing and he could have called the worst of them 5 minutes fighting but
> 2 & 10 works for me and cooled down the combatants. If he had not called
> all the roughing I am sure the game would have gotten out of control.
>
> In terms of the non roughing penalties everything he called that I saw
> should have been called. Some things were out of my sight but based on
> what I saw he deserves the benefit of the doubt.
I agree with you that he called a good game. But I disagree with his
automatic misconducts on coincident roughings. A coach could then send goons
out to tussle with the opponent's stars or snipers, taking them out for a
significant part of the game. This worked a bit (?) to Cornell's advantage,
whether planned or not, since both Halpern and Apps spent 12 minutes cooling
their heels.
Pat Carr
Cornell '96
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|