Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:49:23 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom, sorry for the duplicate post.
re: Maine – Harvard: Was anybody else screaming at Mazzoleni to use his time out when Maine made
it 4-3? Couldn’t understand it at all. The team was clearly rattled then, and the situation
begged for a TO. He needed to settle his team BEFORE Maine tied it. Waiting ‘til Maine tied it
was closing the barn after the horses had escaped; at that point, IMO, a Maine win was inevitable.
I have no doubt that if the game had gone into OT, the outcome would have been exactly the same.
re: NoDak – Holy Cross: I’ll give HC credit for not falling apart after the first goal. The play
was certainly more lopsided than the score, and I thought North Dakota played down to HC’s level.
But I’m willing to put up with it; at least the score wasn’t really lopsided, as it probably would
have been a few years ago. Heck, In the squeakball tournament, the first seed’s first round game
is usually a 40 point blowout.
re: Wisconsin – Ohio State: Didn’t stay up for it (on tape delay, started at 10:00) but FWIW, the
Boston Globe’s writer compared it to a Big Ten football game, with O-State running a “three yards
and a cloud of dust” offense. He called it “three zones, and an ice of mush.”
re: BC – Niagara: The other one that could have been a blowout, but was reasonably competitive
for a first round game. For those who didn’t see it, there was an unsuccessful penalty shot by
Niagara.
Clay
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
|
|
|