HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 06:50:25 -0700
Reply-To:
"Anthony J. Buffa" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
"Anthony J. Buffa" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Organization:
Cal Poly State University
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Exactly. I think league tourneys are just extra games to make more
money. They balloon the season for some teams up to the mid 40s in game
numbers ... something I think should be reigned in. They show nothing to
me about which team in the league should get the bid.

Just my two pesos.

Tony Buffa

RPI '64

=========

[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> Anthony J. Buffa wrote: "I say the team that has stuck to the grindstone
> over the whole season
> deserves the #1 bid to any league."
>
> Ah, but by this logic, we need not have a tournament at all, for the team
> with the best record is also the defacto champion.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2