Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:35:38 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lance Parsons writes:
> There has been a lot of talk about RPI, the academic index,
>and the choice to stay in the ECAC rather than move to HE. While the
>academic strength of a league's constiutent schools might not affect
>the hockey recruitment at RPI, it DOES affect the rest of the class.
>RPI likes to be assoiciated with Harvard, Yale, Cornell, etc.
>Remember, RPI is first an academic instution and secondly a hockey
>school.
I'm hoping you didn't mean to imply that this is not the case in
HE...although if so, I'm not sure why you would say it and the
following.
>I think that that was also a maor factor in the decision to stay with
>the ECAC and I agree with the decision.
- mike (attended RPI and three HE schools, four if you count a summer
course at Lowell)
--- ---
Mike Machnik [log in to unmask]
Cabletron Systems, Inc. *HMM* 11/13/93
***** Unofficial Merrimack Hockey home page under construction at: *****
***** http://www.tiac.net/users/machnik/MChockey/MChockey.html *****
** Send comments/suggestions to: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask] **
|
|
|