In article <[log in to unmask]> "Craig C. Cheslog"
<[log in to unmask]> writes:
>I was "speaking" (via e-mail) with Pete Kester, and neither of us had noticed
>any mention of the results of the men's ice hockey rules committee meetings in
>May. So, I have dug out the NC$$ News report on the meetings (since we were
>both interested) and we both thought that it would be a good idea to post the
>rule changes here as well.
Thanks much for your posting!!! It made for some great reading, and it's
quite encouraging to see the NC$$ following the NHL and USA Hockey a
little closer with respect to the coincidental penalty rules. I've been
waiting for this for a while. Now I won't have to remember two sets
of penalty situations anymore when reffing. :-) -- kennyz
P.S. -- I'm currently compiling the results of the intramural ice hockey
survey which I sent out a while ago. I'll post it as soon as
I'm finished. Thanks to all those who responded.
--
Kenny Zalewski -- Information Technology Services at Rensselaer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 83 Albright Court, Troy, NY, 12180
[log in to unmask] | [log in to unmask] | [log in to unmask]